My pick will be 1911s. I know it's heresy. They're beautiful, & historic but they're also heavy and need more maintenance. I want to love them, I really do. But every time I shoot one I think 'my Glock does this better.' Sorry, John Moses Browning..
I get the history thing, but how a gun feels is more important to me than old memories. If it's heavy and clunky compared to new guns, I don't care how famous it is.My pick will be 1911s. I know it's heresy. They're beautiful, & historic but they're also heavy and need more maintenance. I want to love them, I really do. But every time I shoot one I think 'my Glock does this better.' Sorry, John Moses Browning..
Disagree! Stock 1911's are easy to maintain. It's when they are customized and finely tuned that they become un-reliable and high maintenance (I know, I've had both types from a 1918 Army issue to a Gold Cup). My never-buy pistols are any S & W auto-loader (except Model 41's). Don't get me wrong, I've had S & W revolvers from 22 to 44 mag. Some didn't fit me but that was personal. My favorites were Victory Models, 1917, Model 19, Model 25 and Model 28.
I have a RIA Ultra Match. Nice, reliable, reasonably accurate. Was on sale for under $400.00! Unfortunately, I found a SA XDM Elite just before I got it; the 1911 is used mostly at the range (BTW: Got the SA just before a magazine limit became effective!)That's what I've seen too. Regular pistols usually work fine but the ones people mess with a lot need constant fixing. when people chase perfect, they often lose reliability even if they won't admit it.